Monday, September 7, 2009

Windows Into Spiritual Philosophy

Saturday, August 29, 2009

Introduction to Spiritual Philosophy


Sunday, May 3, 2009

Reverse Engineering Science

Hi, I am back! Sorry for the long pause. I have been busy focusing on my book project. I am finally getting traction on it. Basically the book will be about how to reverse engineer science. I am excited. I was listening to myself a few weeks ago and I heard my mind say to me, "We are ready to write the book. We have the material organized". I was a bit in awe and humility, "woah". I am learning discipline and organization and to listen within again. As I write I can feel the organization come through and at times it is an exceptionally exquisite energy. I am happy.

Reverse engineering science is the best description of the concept of my book. I feel we need to take it apart to examine the mechanics of its thinking...in this way it will be easy to see how our religious beliefs has fully assimilated into our scientific way of thinking.

What has not been understood is what the ancient philosophers were focused on when they invented what is now known as Science. The true nature of thinking is cyclical thinking, to take thought and expand it through the relation of the idea to ourself. In this process the mind will automatically follow the design pattern of consciousness. I will be using my own life experiences as examples of my own trials and tribulations of coming up with the religious beliefs in science and engineering.

Reverse engineering (RE) is the process of discovering the technological principles of a device, object or system through analysis of its structure, function and operation. It often involves taking something apart and analyzing its workings...” Wikipedia

Wednesday, November 26, 2008

A Cry for Help

I observed a drama recently that now frames for me the central problem to all scientific and engineering minds. In lending an ear to a close colleague I heard the exasperation of the mind speak to me for the first time:

“I have solved the most difficult engineering problem in my field, and yet I cannot solve my family.”

Upon hearing the above words from my colleague, my own mind was triggered into the compassion of my loving emotions. A mind that does not have the information to save its own self from its own ignorance, cannot save itself and thus the cry for help was heard.

It was explained to me that he applied the engineering process he learned in his field to establish fact as an independent observer. As an independent observer with established facts, he could then determine right and wrong, and thus all problems could be solved this way if only everyone just followed this process too, including his family.

I explained to him that we have to understand the appropriate design to apply the appropriate engineering process. The engineering process requires constant change and cyclical feedback as to what works and what does not work. It is in constant refinement & continuous improvement. All engineering processes have multiple levels of thinking. There is no one definitive thought for all, yet there is one deterministic factor that applies across the board. You have to constantly learn what doesn't work and incorporate it as lessons learned into the design refinement. If something does not work, then do not keep repeating it, that is, if you want to solve the problem.

The engineering process to build an airplane requires an understanding of the design of an airplane. The engineering process to build a bridge requires an understanding of the design of a bridge. The engineering process to develop a VLSI chip requires an understanding of the digital design process. The engineering process to develop a software application requires an understanding of the software design.

The engineering process to solve a human relationship problem requires an understanding of the human design.

Just as it is not advisable to use the engineering process for an airplane to build a bridge, so it is not advisable to use an engineering process for a machine to solve a problem of the Human design. Unless that is, you are living a hidden religious belief that man has no internal life force, the loving emotions are not real, and man can be separated as parts into automaton machines.

Additionally, machines do not have loving emotions. They are man made processes invented from a belief that separated the mind from the loving emotions (courtesy of Religion), and then separated the mind from the body (courtesy of Descartes). So if the inventor has no clue what love is and sees it only as a physical process, then why should his invention be a product of love or even of an emotional quality as love. It simply is not.

This is the core problem of how we mislead ourself and set ourself up for failure in our own relationships. We have hypnotized ourself into such an infallible state of mind that we think our great dominion over man-made physical processes gives us Mastery over and an understanding of, our own Human design. Truthfully, it does not.

If we do not know Object Oriented Programming, then how will we understand a C++ or Java application?

If we do not understand Structural Engineering then how will we understand how to design and build a bridge?

If we do not know who we are, then how will we understand our Human design and its own engineering process that it follows?

My clarification to my colleague was, “we have to apply the correct engineering process to what it is we want to solve and understand.” Just as we don’t take our car to be repaired at a bakery, and we don’t go to a car mechanic to buy a cake, so we do not apply man-made engineering processes to Man when those man-made engineering processes were created by the Man that does not even know his own design.

This is where my own journey has led me to. My Teacher, Kathy Oddenino teaches me Spiritual Philosophy to fulfill the missing piece of the puzzle in the scientific and engineering disciplines, the Human design.

In our history we taught and learned religious beliefs. The religious belief is that we are simply a physical body. The science and engineering process of today follows the religious belief of the Church fathers who condensed myths and superstitions into a tidy book of rules of physical processes. Religion turned Love into a physical process between male and female roles & identities, marriage as a physical ritual of love, and sex as the physical act of love.

Spiritual philosophy gives us the whole human being, the levels of Love as an organized structure within our Human design as an emotion. Levels of emotions as the energy of our cellular design. The physical process and definition of love by religion no longer serves us anymore. It destroys relationships and our own life because it is no longer adequate to quench the thirst in our mind for an understanding of why we are experiencing these imbalances in our life and our relationships.

When we can understand Love as an emotion…then we will study and learn that happiness is the first level of our loving emotion. Happiness can never be integrated in our thought if we turn our thought to worship something else (external to us) as giving us happiness other than as the emotion within ourself.

When we can acknowledge, accept, and know that love is the choice of happiness for us, within our own mind, then we live the Human design of us in the truth of its design. In this manner, we will have then shifted our mind from fear to love. For we will know that nothing else truly matters but the love, truth, and equality of our mind, to ourself, to our family, to our friends, and to all those Humans we have the wonderment to experience, because our mind will finally acknowledge the female loving emotion within us as completing the other half of us we have been searching for.

Sunday, November 16, 2008

The Engineering Processes of Life, Love, & the Mind

Okay here is an idea that is fresh from my mind. Please let me know what you think of it.

Last year I was talking with my teacher Kathy Oddenino about our challenges we as human beings have right now in our life…it came to me that these challenges we have, sounded like an engineering problem. Kathy emphasized to me, that they were indeed all engineering problems, all requiring engineering solutions.

  • Were we talking about global climate changes?…uhh…no, not really, but maybe in a way.
  • Were we talking about the financial meltdown to be?...uhh…no, not really, but maybe in a way.
  • Were we talking about why bad things happen to good people?...uhhh no, but maybe in a way.
Okay, what were we talking about that was all about an engineering problem requiring an engineering solution?

Human Beings, and the problems we cause in our own life and our environment.

The source?...our mind.

Do we know who we are? Do we strive in the wisdom of Socrates to, “Know Thyself”.

Maybe perhaps only a few can say about their own energy, “I know who I am”.

However, most (hopefully) can perhaps say, “Maybe I do not yet know who I am, but I have learned who I am not and what I am not”, after 10,000 dramas, 7,000 traumas, 4,000 trials of chaos, and 1,000 crises later.

But most likely we all come to the same conclusion and curiosity, “there has got be an easier way”.

What if I propose to you as scientists and engineers that perhaps it’s time to apply our trade as knowledge hounds and problem solvers, on ourself?…if not for the Love of Ourself, but for the Love of Mankind. :-)

So I ask you, given all the ways we have divided and divided and divided all the discovered frontiers of our physical world with PhDs in every field…how about a new engineering discipline?

The Human Design as an engineering and scientific study…to know how our own life is an engineering design, how the loving emotion is an engineering process, how our own mind above all else, is the architect, designer, creator, & inventor, that follows the highest level of an engineering process experienced by us.

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

A follow up on book suggestions

This is a follow up for a book suggestion to catch up with the Systems Theory movement. My first response is posted here. Another book I recommend is Dr. Bruce Lipton's, The Biology of Beliefs. A book I am reading now is Dr. Valerie Hunt's, Infinite Mind: Science of the Human Vibrations of Consciousness.

What does Systems Theory and these books have in common?

It breaks the Religious dogma of Science that was set in place by the Jesuit Scholastic Movement of Roger Bacon and Renee Descartes. Both took the mantle of cause by religion to separate energy (intelligent lifeforce) from matter (physical) so they can say, "look it's true, we are unworthy because this body is just a machine and so is all of nature and earth". This set in place the biological dogma in all of the life sciences to teach randomness, genetics, and the physical body that just lives once and dies.

30 years of Systems Theory research work says, "No", there is order in the chemicals. Dr. Lipton's book details that this order in our cells takes instructions and works with the influences of the environment, aka, nature, earth, and the universe. We are not bound by physical body to physical body, as the Gregory Mendels would have us believe. Dr. Hunt's book shows us that the relationship of us to nature, earth, and the universe through the electromagnetic fields that is the foundation of all. What creates these electromagnetic fields...the chemicals. What do chemicals do...produce energy. Who are we....we are chemically energetic beings.

So Systems Theory says the living systems have Form, Structure, Organization, and Discipline. These living systems are Chemicals. The interaction of chemicals create energy. Energy is us, nature, earth, and the universe as electromagnetism.

So what's Love got to do with it? :-) Everything. Love is the Magnetism.

So could it be that the chemicals are alive and intelligent? It would go straight against the religious philosophy of science that sees things only as unintelligible physical matter unworthy and unequal to a higher being external to itself. We are our own image of the god myth we have been trying to define all of these aeons of our evolution.

I kid you not when I say, Religion has bastardized Aristotle's works and called it Modern Science.

Thursday, July 31, 2008

An Internal Review

Tomorrow August 1st, will be my birthday and I will turn 40….yes…right on the day of a total solar eclipse. So I have been asking myself how I feel and where am I in my growth.

I have been thinking about this milestone earlier, and reviewing my own Soul growth in my Brain. I wanted to see how I have been doing over the course of not years in this life, but over the continuity of lifetimes where I passed the 40 year old milestone. Some lifetimes I aborted as a fetus, some lifetimes I died early…and then there were the lifetimes that were long lived. I felt the progression of growth in my vision that my Brain was giving me, and they were of the intellectual awareness and understanding of the physical. I realize that it is for me in this lifetime to transition from the intellectual to include the emotional part of my design and bring them together as one, to function as an integrated energy in my daily life.

I have brought into this life many memories of lifetimes as a Philosopher, many lifetimes as an Engineer, and other lifetimes focused in Science. It has taken me all of these 40 years in this lifetime just to acknowledge and accept that I am an eternal being, because the mind is eternal. The mind is eternal because the mind is Energy and Energy is the chemical interaction which knows itself as infinite in self reflective patterns. Through our chemical design, the memories of many, many lifetimes is in the flick of a thought. Our Brain does it all for us, just by our thinking.

As I review the patterns of science and engineering as it is practiced today, to the patterns of the science and engineering that I have lived, breathed, and practiced over many tens of thousands of years and lifetimes, I have come to realize that it is time for me to speak my truth in what I know to be the truth of science and engineering.

Everywhere we read about the changes in science, there seems to be more of an interest and a competition to integrate and merge science and religion, to explain spirituality. The popular notion is the cult following to use quantum mechanics as a tool to integrate science and religion. For me, Quantum Mechanics is still the study of the external physical matter. It is a level of physical matter just as a billiard ball is physical matter, and so are the atoms, and then the electrons, and then the quarks, and then strings, etc…At every turn we will always reveal a level of physical matter. Within the physical matter is a sub-level that gives it shape….This is the fractal pattern of energy. This is why I now realize that quantum mechanics is a level of physical matter. As a level of physical matter, it is but one level of energy from infinite number of levels both small and large.

This story of energy is what needs to be told. It governs the design and function of our physical matter and how we were designed to complete our cycle of energy through the air, water, and food of nature. When we know our design and function, we gain the Knowledge (Science) of our life. Then we become highly skilled at creating precisely what we want in our life in an effortless manner. This is what engineering is all about. We use our science of life to engineer our life to a greater and greater level of perfection so that it serves us and supports us in creating what we want in our life.

I am beginning to strengthen my belief that there is no need to integrate science and religion because they are already one and the same system of thought, as Religious Philosophy. For science to advance in greater leaps beyond religious thought, we have to learn what it means to be energy first, matter second. That it is the energy as chemicals that create our physical matter. Then perhaps we will begin to open up to the love and the powerful intelligence that is within us, rather than from the concept of our external god we have created from our lifetimes of fear beliefs.